Gijs Brouwer vs Mats Moraing Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L L W L
Form
L W L L W L W W L LCara A Cara: Brouwer 0 - 1 Moraing
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Brouwer victoriosa 0 y Moraing victoriosa 2. El último partido entre Brouwer y Moraing fue en el Turin Challenger, el 03-03-2022, Cuartos de Second, I.hard, con Mats Moraing obteniendo la victoria 6-4 6-4
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gijs Brouwer | 0 |
| Mats Moraing | 1 |
Turin Challenger(03-03-2022)
6
4
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Partidos cara a cara | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Ganados | 2 |
| 8 | Juegos Ganados | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Gijs Brouwer
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Gijs Brouwer
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Max Houkes
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Gijs Brouwer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Gijs Brouwer
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Gijs Brouwer
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Bernard Tomic
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Gijs Brouwer
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Lucas Pouille
78%
(
71 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ugo Blanchet
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
8
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Mats Moraing
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Boris Butulija
Player
Mats Moraing
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Mats Moraing
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
10 of
20)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
8 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Niklas Schell
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Tomas Lanik
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Mats Moraing
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
29%
(
8 of
28)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
10 of
17)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
30
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Federico Iannaccone
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
Player
Mats Moraing
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
49%
(
19 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40
Total Points Won
46
|
3-6 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Mats Moraing
62%
(
79 of
128)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
0
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
52 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
125
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Andrey Chepelev
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
28 of
35)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (330/245) | Win/Loss | 59% (359/246) |
| 56% (728/563) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (794/570) |
| 53% (6466/5755) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6841/5951) |
| 61% (101/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (94/63) |
| 57% (113/87) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (135/99) |
| 55% (97/79) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (124/70) |
| 56% (19/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 30% (6/14) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
| 2114 | Aces Total | 4143 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1411 | Total Double Faults | 1813 |
| 1:17:54 | Average Match Time | 1:3:3 |
| 448.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 193.4 |
| 66% (22215/33834) | 1st Serve % | 57% (17149/30036) |
| 70% (15542/22215) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (13196/17149) |
| 50% (5811/11619) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6286/12886) |
| 42% (1430/3415) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1206/2808) |
| 40% (13665/34431) | Return Points Win % | 38% (11974/31390) |
| 44% (7/9) | Slam W/L | 35% (8/15) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 54% (28/24) | Main Tour W/L | 36% (9/16) |
| 53% (91/80) | Challenger W/L | 52% (140/129) |
| 61% (204/131) | Futures W/L | 71% (201/84) |
| 57% (319/559) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (354/571) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 43% (72/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (103/196) |
| 50% (73/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (103/174) |
| 89% (332/295) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (345/304) |
| 11% (332/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (345/38) |
| 14% (242/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (259/57) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
